Section 192 of the Penal Law provides: a person who threatens another person in any way with unlawful harm to their body, liberty, property, good name, or livelihood, whether their own or that of another person, with the intent to intimidate or provoke, is liable to up to 3 years of imprisonment.
What is the offense of threats?
Section 192 of the Penal Law provides: a person who threatens another person in any way with unlawful harm to their body, liberty, property, good name, or livelihood, whether their own or that of another person, with the intent to intimidate or provoke, is liable to up to 3 years of imprisonment. The offense is especially broad: a threat may be conveyed orally, in writing, in a message, in an emoji, by a gesture, and even through conduct.
What is the difference between a threat and a permissible expression?
The test established by case law is objective: whether a reasonable person who heard the words in those circumstances would see them as a threat. Statements made in a moment of anger, in the heat of an argument, or as figurative language are not necessarily an offense, and this is precisely where the line of defense runs. On the other hand, there is no need for the threatened person to actually be afraid, and there is no need for the threatening person to have a genuine intention to carry it out: intent to intimidate is sufficient.
A common offense that gets complicated quickly
Threats is one of the most common offenses in Israel: neighbor disputes, road altercations, family conflicts, and heated correspondence generate thousands of cases a year. The problem: a threats case almost always comes with related offenses, harassment, trespassing, property damage, and sometimes within the framework of domestic violence with a presumption of dangerousness and arrest. Even this "minor" offense creates a criminal record that stains for years.
Ways a case can end
In threats cases with no criminal record, there are real possibilities of ending the matter without an indictment: closure for lack of public interest, a conditional arrangement, and after an indictment, conclusion without a conviction. The way there goes through proper management of the investigation and a professional approach to the prosecution. Israel Arama, formerly of the Tel Aviv District Attorney's Office, represents suspects in threats offenses from the stage of being summoned for questioning. Contact us for an initial consultation with no obligation.
What is the offense of threats?
Section 192 of the Penal Law provides: a person who threatens another person in any way with unlawful harm to their body, liberty, property, good name, or livelihood, whether their own or that of another person, with the intent to intimidate or provoke, is liable to up to 3 years of imprisonment. The offense is especially broad: a threat may be conveyed orally, in writing, in a message, in an emoji, by a gesture, and even through conduct.
What is the difference between a threat and a permissible expression?
The test established by case law is objective: whether a reasonable person who heard the words in those circumstances would see them as a threat. Statements made in a moment of anger, in the heat of an argument, or as figurative language are not necessarily an offense, and this is precisely where the line of defense runs. On the other hand, there is no need for the threatened person to actually be afraid, and there is no need for the threatening person to have a genuine intention to carry it out: intent to intimidate is sufficient.
A common offense that gets complicated quickly — what is important to know?
Threats is one of the most common offenses in Israel: neighbor disputes, road altercations, family conflicts, and heated correspondence generate thousands of cases a year. The problem: a threats case almost always comes with related offenses, harassment, trespassing, property damage, and sometimes within the framework of domestic violence with a presumption of dangerousness and arrest. Even this "minor" offense creates a criminal record that stains for years.
Ways a case can end — what is important to know?
In threats cases with no criminal record, there are real possibilities of ending the matter without an indictment: closure for lack of public interest, a conditional arrangement, and after an indictment, conclusion without a conviction. The way there goes through proper management of the investigation and a professional approach to the prosecution.
This information is for initial orientation about the service and contact process. It is not individual legal advice.
Initial call No obligation